In Brief
In this criminal appeal, the Supreme Court considered whether a High Court could reverse a trial court's acquittal order in a murder case based on circumstantial evidence. The trial court had acquitted the accused, finding that the prosecution failed to establish a complete chain of circumstances linking them to the crime. The High Court reversed this, convicting them. The Supreme Court held that in circumstantial evidence cases, the High Court cannot interfere with acquittals unless the trial court's reasoning is perverse or contradicts the evidence. Since the trial court properly found gaps in the prosecution's chain of circumstances, the Court allowed the appeal and reinstated the acquittal.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.