Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2026-01-06 allowed

Arvind Dham vs Directorate of Enforcement

Bench: 2 — Sanjay Kumar, Alok Aradhe

In Brief

In this money-laundering case, Arvind Dham—a former chairman of Amtek Group—challenged his detention under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. The Delhi High Court had refused bail despite no trial having commenced after 16 months of incarceration. The Supreme Court allowed his appeal and granted bail, holding that prolonged pretrial detention without commencement or reasonable progress of trial violates the constitutional right to speedy trial under Article 21, regardless of offence gravity. The Court emphasized that economic offences cannot be treated as a homogeneous class warranting blanket bail denial. Bail was granted with conditions including passport surrender and contact information.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Money Laundering Bail Fundamental Rights Criminal Procedure Economic Offences Right to Speedy Trial Constitutional Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login