Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 22 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-12-08 partly_allowed

Asharfi vs State of Uttar Pradesh

Bench: 2 — R. Banumathi

In Brief

Asharfi was convicted by the trial court and High Court for rape under IPC Section 376(2)(g) and under Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act following an incident on 8–9 December 1995. The Supreme Court upheld his rape conviction and accompanying sentences but set aside the conviction under Section 3(2)(v). The Court held that the unamended version of Section 3(2)(v) (applicable at the time) required proof that rape was committed 'on the ground that' the victim belonged to SC/ST—a test of the accused's intention or caste-motivated intent. The evidence did not establish this intent. The Court noted that a 2016 amendment changed the test to mere 'knowledge' of the victim's SC/ST status, but this applied only prospectively. The appeal was partly allowed; Asharfi was released as he had already served over 10 years."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Sexual Offences SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act Statutory Interpretation Caste-Based Discrimination Amendment Act

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login