Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-04-12 partly_allowed

Ashutosh Kumar vs Film and Television Institute of India and Another

Bench: 2 — Sanjay Kishan Kaul

In Brief

A colour blind appellant challenged his rejection from the Film and Television Institute of India's (FTII) diploma in editing. The Supreme Court appointed an expert committee of filmmakers and an ophthalmologist to assess whether colour blindness prevents successful completion of the course. The committee concluded that all individuals with colour blindness should be permitted to enrol in all FTII courses, and limitations can be overcome through reasonable accommodation (such as making the colour grading module elective or providing assistants). The court adopted this view, striking down the blanket ban on colour blind applicants. However, due to passage of time, the appellant's relief was deferred pending FTII's response on accommodating him in a future academic year.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Right to Equality Educational Rights Disability Rights Reasonable Accommodation Arts and Culture

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login