Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-02-18 disposed

Assistant Engineer (D1), Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited & Anr vs Rahamatullah Khan alias Rahamjulla

Bench: 2 — Uday Umesh Lalit, Indu Malhotra

In Brief

A power utility company raised an additional electricity bill against a consumer after discovering a billing error. The bill was raised months after the original billing period, citing a tariff code mistake discovered during internal audit. The court interpreted the Electricity Act, 2003, holding that the two-year limitation period for disconnection of supply runs from when the original bill was first issued, not from when the mistake is discovered. While utilities may recover additional amounts owed due to genuine mistakes, they cannot disconnect electricity supply after two years to enforce such claims, though other legal remedies remain available.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Electricity Law Limitation Consumer Protection Statutory Interpretation Disconnection of Supply Tariff Billing Recovery of Dues

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login