In Brief
The case concerns 159 workers engaged in loading and unloading commodities in godowns run by the U.P. State Warehousing Corporation. The Corporation challenged an order requiring it to pay provident fund contributions for these workers under the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. The High Court had accepted the Corporation's argument based on an earlier finding in Industrial Disputes Act proceedings that no employer-employee relationship existed. The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred by relying on findings from Industrial Disputes Act proceedings rather than examining the specific definition of 'employee' under Section 2(f) of the Provident Funds Act. The Court set aside the High Court order and remanded the case for fresh consideration based on the correct statutory definition."
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.