Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-04-18 disposed

Ayan Chatterjee vs Future Technology Foundation Inc. & Ors

Bench: 2 — Abhay Manohar Sapre

In Brief

A tenant sought a declaration of tenancy rights and permanent injunction against interference with possession of a property. The Trial Court maintained status quo, and the High Court appointed a special officer to preserve the property. The defendant appealed, and the Supreme Court held that prima facie findings made during interlocutory injunction proceedings do not bind or influence the Trial Court's final decision on the merits of the suit. The Court directed the Trial Court to proceed to trial uninfluenced by earlier observations, within one year, and maintained the interim preservation order until final judgment. The civil suit would be decided solely on the basis of pleadings and evidence adduced at trial."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Temporary Injunction Interlocutory Proceedings Tenancy Trial Court Proceedings Documentary Evidence

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login