Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Monday, 10 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-05-08 allowed

B.C. Singh (D) by Lrs vs J.M. Utarid (D) by Lrs

Bench: 2 — S. Abdul Nazeer

In Brief

Dr. B.C. Singh jointly purchased Capel Cottage with his wife, Dr. S.L. Singh, an Indian Christian. After Dr. S.L. Singh died intestate without children in 1976, Dr. B.C. Singh sought eviction of defendant J.M. Utarid, who claimed to be the intestate's distant kindred and asserted a share in the property. The High Court allowed the defendant's claim. The Supreme Court reversed this, holding that under the Indian Succession Act's succession rules, nearer kindred (here, the intestate's sister Ida Utarid) exclude distant kindred. The defendant, being a distant relative, had no succession right. The surviving husband retained 3/4 of the property; the remaining 1/4 would devolve to the nearest kindred, not distant relatives.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Succession Law Intestate Succession Family Law Property Law Kinship and Relatives Indian Succession Act

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login