Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-05-10 dismissed

B.K. PAVITRA vs UNION OF INDIA

Bench: 2 — Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Uday Umesh Lalit

In Brief

The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Karnataka Reservation Act 2018, which provides consequential seniority to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes government servants promoted on merit-based reservation. The Court held that the Act validly cured the defect in the earlier 2002 Act, which was struck down for lacking quantifiable data on inadequacy of representation and administrative efficiency. Following the earlier judgment, the state properly conducted the Ratna Prabha Committee exercise to collect relevant data. The legislature has constitutional power to enact curative legislation with retrospective effect to remedy judicially identified defects without usurping judicial authority. The concept of creamy layer does not apply to consequential seniority in promotion. The Court emphasized that the Constitution mandates substantive, not merely formal, equality, and that diverse representation in administration is itself a constitutional value consistent with maintaining administrative efficiency. The Governor's referral of the Bill to the President was constitutionally valid and non-justiciable. All petitions challenging the Act were dismissed."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Administrative Law Reservation and Affirmative Action Equality Civil Service Employment Seniority in Public Services Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Article 16(4A)

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login