Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-11-01 partly_allowed

Babasaheb Maruti Kamble vs State of Maharashtra

Bench: 3 — A.K. Sikri

In Brief

A man convicted of murder (Section 302 IPC), rape (Section 376(2)(f)), and wrongful confinement (Section 342) under circumstantial evidence was awarded death sentence. On appeal, the Supreme Court upheld the conviction based on an unbroken chain of incriminating circumstances (the victim's body found in his house, his lies to her mother, recovered clothing, DNA evidence). However, it held the case did not qualify as 'rarest of rare' for capital punishment. The Court commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment capped at 20 years minimum, emphasizing that death sentence cases require reasoned orders and that Special Leave Petitions cannot be dismissed in limine without explaining the sentencing decision.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Death Penalty Sentencing Special Leave Petition Mitigating Circumstances Aggravating Circumstances Circumstantial Evidence Confirmation of Death Sentence

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login