Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-08-14

BABULAL VARDHARJI GURJAR vs VEER GURJAR ALUMINIUM INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. & ANR

Bench: 2 — A.M. Khanwilkar, Dinesh Maheshwari

In Brief

A financial creditor sought to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against a corporate debtor under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, specifying the default date as 08.07.2011 but filing the application in March 2018—nearly seven years later. The Supreme Court held that applications under Section 7 are subject to a three-year limitation period under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, running from the date of default. Since default occurred more than three years prior to filing, the application was barred by limitation. The Court rejected arguments that the Code's commencement date reset the period, that mortgage limitation periods apply, or that subsequent balance sheet entries could revive the claim. All proceedings under the barred application were annulled.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Limitation Act Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process Financial Creditor Default Procedural Law Statutes of Limitation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login