Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-03-27 allowed

BAJAJ AUTO LIMITED vs UNION OF INDIA

Bench: 3 — Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hemant Gupta, L. Nageswara Rao

In Brief

Bajaj Auto Limited, a two-wheeler manufacturer exempted from central excise duty under a special incentive notification for Uttarakhand, challenged demands for National Calamity Contingent Duty (NCCD), Education Cess, and Secondary & Higher Education Cess. The Supreme Court held that once excise duty is exempted, all levies that constitute or surcharge on excise duty are also exempted. Although NCCD is levied on the product (not the value of excise duty), it retains the character of excise duty and must follow exemptions granted to excise duty. Exemption notifications are to be interpreted liberally once applicability is established. The Court allowed the appeal, quashing the demand notice and holding Bajaj not liable for any of the three cesses.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Excise Duty Taxation Finance Law Administrative Law Exemption Notifications Constitutional Interpretation Cesses

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login