Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-05-08 dismissed

Bandaru Ramesh vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Bench: 2 — Prafulla C. Pant

In Brief

The appellant, Bandaru Ramesh, was convicted of murdering his cousin Rajnikanth, stealing cash and gold ornaments, and retaining the stolen property. The crime was established through circumstantial evidence: the appellant was the last to see the deceased alive, misled the victim's mother about the deceased's whereabouts, was left with the house keys, and abandoned the house before the body was discovered. Stolen valuables were recovered from him. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction, finding a complete and unbroken chain of circumstances pointing exclusively to the appellant's guilt, with no break in the logical inference.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Circumstantial Evidence Murder Theft and Retention Burden of Proof

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login