Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-02-20 allowed

BANK OF BARODA vs FAROOQ ALI KHAN & ORS

Bench: 2 — Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Manoj Misra

In Brief

A bank sought to initiate personal insolvency proceedings against the director of a corporate debtor who had given personal guarantees for the company's loans. The respondent filed a writ petition in the High Court claiming his liability as guarantor had been waived. The High Court allowed the petition and quashed the insolvency proceedings. The Supreme Court reversed this, holding that the High Court wrongly interdicted the proceedings before the statutory process was complete. Under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, the Adjudicating Authority must appoint a resolution professional to examine the application and submit a report before making any judicial determination. Questions about whether the debt exists and whether the guarantee was waived must be decided by the Adjudicating Authority, not the High Court in judicial review. The appeal was allowed and the proceedings restored.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Judicial Review Constitutional Law Personal Insolvency Guarantors Statutory Procedure High Court Jurisdiction

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login