Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-05-18 dismissed

BBR (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED vs S.P. SINGLA CONSTRUCTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED

Bench: 2 — Ajay Rastogi, Sanjiv Khanna

In Brief

BBR (India) Private Limited contracted with S.P. Singla Constructions to supply cables for a bridge, with an arbitration clause silent on the seat of arbitration. The first arbitrator fixed Panchkula, Haryana as the seat in August 2014. After his recusal, a new arbitrator took over and changed the venue to Delhi in June 2015, where the substantive proceedings and award were made. The question arose: does changing the venue shift the jurisdictional seat, thereby moving jurisdiction from Panchkula to Delhi? The Supreme Court held that once an arbitrator fixes the seat under Section 20(2) of the Arbitration Act, it remains static and cannot be unilaterally changed. The change of venue (actual place of proceedings) does not alter the jurisdictional seat unless parties mutually consent. Certainty of jurisdiction is paramount; only the courts at the fixed seat have exclusive supervisory jurisdiction. Appeals dismissed."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration and Conciliation Seat of Arbitration Venue Jurisdictional Competence Civil Procedure Arbitrator Change of Arbitrator

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login