Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Saturday, 01 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2022-09-22 partly_allowed

BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LTD. AND OTHERS ETC vs M/S TATA COMMUNICATIONS LTD. ETC

Bench: 2 — Ajay Rastogi, B.V. Nagarathna

In Brief

BSNL sought to levy infrastructure charges for telecommunications operators retrospectively from 1st April 2009 under a circular issued in June 2012. The Tribunal held that while BSNL could revise charges, the circular could apply only prospectively from 1st April 2013. The Supreme Court upheld that administrative circulars cannot operate retrospectively without legislative authority, but held that BSNL could levy charges prospectively from 2013 using a notional fixation mechanism with 10% annual increases computed from the new rates, without requiring payment for the prior period.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Telecom Regulation Administrative Law Circular/Notification Retrospectivity Rate-Setting Authority Infrastructure Charges

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login