Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-12-12 allowed

Bharatsing S/o Gulabsingh Jakhad & Ors vs State of Maharashtra & Ors

Bench: 2 — Kurian

In Brief

Landowners applied under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for enhancement of compensation after a court awarded higher compensation to other claimants in the same acquisition. The Collector decided their application in 2000, granting enhancement, while appeals against the underlying awards were still pending before the High Court. The High Court subsequently enhanced compensation further in 2009. The landowners' second application for re-determination based on the High Court judgment was dismissed as the second application was not permissible under Section 28A. The Supreme Court held that while only one Section 28A application is normally allowed, the Collector should have kept the first application pending until appeals concluded, then decided it based on final appellate judgment. The Court set aside the 2000 order and remitted the matter for fresh consideration in light of the 2009 judgment."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Land Acquisition Compensation Administrative Law Appellate Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login