Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-12-13 allowed

BHARTI ARORA vs THE STATE OF HARYANA

Bench: 3 — B.R. Gavai, Prashant Kumar Mishra, K.V. Viswanathan

In Brief

The Supreme Court quashed proceedings initiated against Bharti Arora, a Superintendent of Police, for an alleged offence under Section 58 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. The trial court had recorded adverse findings against her without notice or hearing, in violation of natural justice. The Court held that such proceedings must be tried summarily by a Magistrate, not a Special Court. The appellant's actions in ordering an inquiry were in good faith discharge of duty and protected by statutory immunity. The Court found the trial judge's conduct predetermined and biased, having dictated the order after receiving a transfer order and conducted seven hearings in ten days, demonstrating violation of procedural fairness.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Criminal Procedure Natural Justice Administrative Law Police Powers Protection of Public Servants Good Faith Bias and Impartiality

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login