Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Wednesday, 28 October 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2023-05-10 disposed

Bhasker & Anr vs Ayodhya Jewellers

Bench: 2 — Abhay S. Oka, Rajesh Bindal

In Brief

A property was auctioned and sold in execution of a decree. The auction was confirmed on 16 July 2009, but the sale certificate was issued only on 5 February 2010. The purchaser then applied for possession on 27 July 2010. The High Court upheld the application, holding that limitation under Article 134 (Limitation Act) started from the sale certificate date. The Supreme Court found an inconsistency: Rule 95 of Order XXI (CPC) requires a sale certificate before applying for possession, but Article 134 counts limitation from the date of confirmation. The Court held that the earlier judgment in Pattam Khader Khan required reconsideration by a larger bench and referred the matter accordingly, leaving the question open about when limitation truly begins.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Civil Procedure Limitation Execution of Decrees Auction Possession Statutory Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login