Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Sunday, 02 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-11-10 allowed

BHUPESH RATHOD vs DAYASHANKAR PRASAD CHAURASIA & ANR

Bench: 2 — Sanjay Kishan Kaul, M.M. Sundresh

In Brief

A man issued eight cheques totaling Rs. 1,60,000 to a registered company, which dishonoured due to insufficient funds. The company, through its Managing Director, filed a criminal complaint for cheque dishonour under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused objected that the complaint was not properly filed in the Company's name. The trial court and High Court acquitted him on technical grounds. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that a corporate payee may file a complaint through an authorized Managing Director even if the Managing Director's name appears first in the cause title, provided the Company is clearly identified and authorization is demonstrated. Formal defects cannot defeat substantively valid proceedings.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Negotiable Instruments Act Criminal Procedure Corporate Entity as Complainant Cheque Dishonour Presumptions

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login