Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-10-12 allowed

Bikramjit Singh vs State of Punjab

Bench: 3 — R.F. Nariman, Sanjay Kumar, Alok Aradhe

In Brief

Bikramjit Singh was arrested in November 2018 for offences under the Indian Penal Code, Arms Act, Explosive Substances Act, and UAPA arising from a hand grenade attack. After 90 days in custody, he sought default bail, but a Magistrate wrongly extended the investigation period. The High Court dismissed his plea, holding that once the charge sheet was filed, default bail could not be granted. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that: (1) only Special Courts designated under the NIA Act have jurisdiction to extend investigation time for UAPA offences—not Magistrates; and (2) once an accused applies for default bail before a charge sheet is filed, that indefeasible right cannot be defeated by subsequent filing of the charge sheet. The Court ordered his release on default bail.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Bail UAPA Unlawful Activities Prevention Act NIA Act Jurisdiction Default Bail Investigation Period Constitutional Law Personal Liberty

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login