Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-03-01 disposed

Board of Trustees, Port of Kandla vs Official Liquidator

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The Board of Trustees, Port of Kandla collected port charges from a company that believed it had overpaid by Rs. 6,99,588.66. The company claimed refund more than six months after payment, which the Board rejected citing Section 55 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963—a provision requiring refund claims within six months of payment. The High Court allowed the company's writ petition. The Supreme Court held that Section 55 extinguishes the substantive right to claim refund if not pursued within six months, and constitutional courts cannot grant relief on extinguished rights. However, it did not interfere with the High Court's order because the Board retains discretionary power under Section 55's proviso to remit overcharges at any time, applied rationally as a public authority.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Port Authority Refunds Limitation of Actions Constitutional Remedies Interpretation of Statutes

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login