Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-04-16 allowed

Boota Singh & Others vs State of Haryana

Bench: 2 — Uday Umesh Lalit

In Brief

The appellants were apprehended in a private jeep parked on a public road with 75 kg of poppy straw. The Trial Court and High Court upheld their conviction under Section 15 of the NDPS Act, treating the search as permissible under Section 43 of the Act (seizure in a public place). However, the Supreme Court reversed the convictions. The Court held that a private vehicle, even when on a public road, is not a 'public place' and thus Section 42 (not Section 43) applies. Since the police failed to record the tip-off information in writing or notify their superior before the search—with no satisfactory explanation—there was total non-compliance with Section 42. Such non-compliance renders the search unlawful, making the evidence inadmissible. The appellants were acquitted.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Search and Seizure Criminal Procedure Evidence

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login