Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-01-24 dismissed

Britannia Industries Ltd vs Bombay Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee & Anr

Bench: 2 — R. Banumathi

In Brief

Britannia Industries challenged the applicability of Maharashtra's agricultural marketing law to edible oil, vanaspati, and sugar. The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's finding that all three products qualify as 'agricultural produce' under the Act despite undergoing processing, because their raw materials are agricultural in origin and listed in the Act's Schedule. The Court confirmed the Market Committee can levy market fees only on sugar purchased within its notified market area. It directed the appellant to submit purchase documents to the Committee for verification regarding sugar sourced outside the market area.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Agricultural Law Statutory Interpretation Marketing Regulation Administrative Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login