Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-08-01 allowed

Central Bureau of Investigation vs M. Sivamani

Bench: 2 — Adarsh Kumar Goel

In Brief

The Central Bureau of Investigation appealed against the High Court's quashing of proceedings against an advocate accused of falsifying a motor accident compensation claim. The key issue was whether the statutory bar under Section 195(1)(a)(i) CrPC (which requires a written complaint from a public servant or superior to prosecute certain offences) prevented the court from taking cognizance based on the CBI's charge sheet, though the High Court had directed the investigation in public interest. The Supreme Court held that while the bar is mandatory, it must be understood purposively. A High Court's direction to investigate in public interest serves the same protective function as a public servant's written complaint. Therefore, the bar under Section 195(1)(a) cannot be invoked to prevent cognizance following a High Court direction. The appeal was allowed and proceedings were set aside.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Criminal Law Section 195 CrPC Public Justice False Evidence Abuse of Process

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login