Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-12-15 partly_allowed

Centrotrade Minerals & Metal Inc vs Hindustan Copper Ltd

Bench: 3 — Madan B. Lokur

In Brief

The Supreme Court examined whether a two-tier arbitration clause in a commercial contract complies with Indian law. Centrotrade and Hindustan Copper agreed to first resolve disputes through Indian arbitration, with appeal rights to London-based arbitration under ICC rules. The Court held that such two-tier arbitration procedures are permissible and do not violate the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 or India's public policy. The Act's provisions do not prohibit parties from mutually agreeing to appellate arbitration. The Court emphasized party autonomy as fundamental in arbitration and directed separate consideration of enforcement issues.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration Party Autonomy Two-Tier Arbitration Public Policy International Commercial Arbitration

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login