Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-07-06 partly_allowed

Chairman and Managing Director FCI and Ors vs Jagdish Balaram Bahira and Ors

Bench: 3 — D. Y. Chandrachud

In Brief

This landmark batch of appeals concerns the constitutional protection of reserved benefits in public employment and education. Individuals who obtained appointments or admissions claiming to belong to Scheduled Castes, Tribes, or other reserved categories had their caste certificates invalidated upon scrutiny. They sought court protection arguing equities of time and relying on prior Supreme Court decisions. The Court held: obtaining reserved benefits through a false caste certificate is constitutional fraud that harms genuine beneficiaries. The Maharashtra Caste Certificate Act, 2001 codifies the regime requiring withdrawal of civil benefits when a claim is invalidated—no dishonest intent is required for civil consequences. The Court overruled prior bench decisions that had protected such persons. Article 142 power cannot defeat statutory intent. Most appeals allowing protection were set aside; few were dismissed upholding terminations.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Reservation and Affirmative Action Scheduled Castes and Tribes Public Employment Educational Admissions Caste Certificates Fraud Article 142

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login