Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 30 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2025-07-28 allowed

Chirag sen and Anr. Etc vs State of Karnataka and Anr

Bench: 2 — Sudhanshu Dhulia, Aravind Kumar

In Brief

National badminton players Chirag Sen and Lakshya Sen faced criminal charges for allegedly falsifying birth records to qualify for age-restricted tournaments. A private complainant alleged they and their coach conspired to forge documents. However, identical allegations had been examined and closed eight years earlier by the Sports Authority of India and Central Vigilance Commission, which found no wrongdoing. The Supreme Court found the complaint was driven by personal vendetta—the complainant's grievance arose only after his daughter was denied academy admission. The Court held the allegations lacked essential criminal elements, relied on unverified documents, and showed no evidence of dishonest gain or wrongful loss. Finding clear abuse of process, the Court quashed the FIR and all proceedings.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Abuse of Process Evidence Forgery and Fraud Sports Law Administrative Law Vindictiveness

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login