Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-07-08 dismissed

Jaipur -II vs M/s Miraj Products Pvt. Ltd

Bench: 2 — Abhay S. Oka, Pankaj Mithal

In Brief

The respondent, a chewing tobacco manufacturer, packed 33 small pouches (6 gms each) and one larger pouch (15 gms) into poly packs marked with an MRP of Rs. 36. These poly packs were then placed 100 to a bag (HDPE bags) and sold to distributors and dealers. The Revenue demanded excise duty under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, arguing the poly packs were retail packages. The Supreme Court held that since the respondent sold HDPE bags (not individual poly packs) to intermediaries, these wholesale packages did not require price declaration under the Weights and Measures Rules. Therefore, Section 4A did not apply. The appeal was dismissed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Excise Law Standards of Weights and Measures Taxation Packaged Commodities Retail vs Wholesale Administrative Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login