Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-03-06

Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur vs Universal Ferro & Allied Chemicals Ltd. & Anr

Bench: 3 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Universal Ferro & Allied Chemicals Ltd transferred Manganese Ore to be processed into Silicon Manganese. The Central Excise authorities disputed whether this transaction qualified as a 'sale' under excise law and whether exemption applied. The Supreme Court held that 'sale' under the Central Excise Act must be interpreted according to the Act's own statutory definition, not the Sale of Goods Act. Since goods were transferred for valuable consideration in ordinary trade, they constituted a 'sale' attracting exemption. The Court emphasized that different statutes with different purposes cannot have definitions mechanically applied across them. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the exemption notification applicability."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Excise Law Central Excise Tariff Act Sale of Goods Act Export Processing Zone Classification

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login