Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-04-03 allowed

Commissioner of Income Tax, Central-4, Mumbai vs Nitco Tiles Limited

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The Supreme Court considered whether the High Court properly declined to admit certain questions of law in an income tax appeal by relying on an earlier High Court judgment in the Reliance Industries case. The Court held that because the Supreme Court had remitted the Reliance Industries case back to the High Court for fresh consideration of the specific question of whether sales tax incentive constitutes a capital receipt, the High Court must admit the substantive questions in the present case and decide them on merits rather than dismissing them based on the earlier judgment. The appeal was allowed and the case remitted to the High Court.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Income Tax Tax Law Capital Receipt Revenue Receipt Appellate Procedure Special Leave Petition

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login