Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-09-09 allowed

COX & KINGS LTD vs SAP INDIA PVT. LTD. & ANR

Bench: 3 — Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J.B. Pardiwala, Manoj Misra

In Brief

Cox & Kings Ltd. sought appointment of an arbitrator under an arbitration agreement to resolve disputes with SAP India Pvt. Ltd., seeking to include SAP's German parent company (SAP SE GMBH), a non-signatory. The Supreme Court held that the referral court at Section 11(6) stage must only prima facie examine whether an arbitration agreement exists and cannot make complex determinations about whether non-signatories are bound by it. Such questions should be left to the arbitral tribunal under the competence-competence doctrine. The tribunal may apply legal doctrines and examine evidence to decide its jurisdiction over non-signatories, provided it grants natural justice. The petition was allowed and an arbitrator appointed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Arbitration Non-signatory parties Competence-competence Group of Companies Doctrine Judicial Intervention Appointment of Arbitrator Section 11 of Arbitration Act

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login