Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-07-02 dismissed

Craft Interiors (P) Ltd vs Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Intelligence) & Anr

Bench: 2 — Rastogi

In Brief

Craft Interiors, an interior decoration company, purchased goods (timber, plywood, glass sheets) from registered dealers and incorporated them into works contracts. It claimed deductions under Rule 6(4)(m)(i) of the Karnataka Sales Tax Rules, which permits deductions for goods used "in the same form" they were purchased. The tax authority denied the deduction, arguing the goods were transformed (e.g., timber was cut and modified). The Supreme Court held that Section 5B (charging provision) and Rule 6(4)(m)(i) (deduction provision) operate in different spheres and are consistent. Rule 6(4)(m)(i) applies only when goods retain their original identity; goods transformed into different commodities are separately taxable and not entitled to deduction. The appeal was dismissed, allowing the assessment to proceed.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Sales Tax Deduction Works Contracts Goods Transformation Tax Validity Constitutional Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login