Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 13 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2026-05-07 allowed

Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission vs Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd

Bench: 2 — Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Alok Aradhe

In Brief

A power plant built temporarily for the 2010 Commonwealth Games with a contracted six-year operational life sought to recover its entire capital cost through depreciation over its fifteen-year technical lifespan, even though it stopped supplying electricity after six years. The Court held that consumers cannot be charged for electricity not supplied. Depreciation must align with the contractual operational period, not technical equipment life. The Court balanced utilities' right to reasonable cost recovery against the paramount duty to safeguard consumer interests. Since the plant had freely available options to operate as a merchant generator, shifting unrecovered costs to Delhi consumers violated this balance.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Electricity Law Tariff Determination Regulatory Policy Consumer Protection Cost Recovery Statutory Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login