Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Monday, 03 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2021-08-04 allowed

Dena Bank (now Bank of Baroda) vs C. Shivakumar Reddy and Anr

Bench: 2 — Indira Banerjee, L. Nageswara Rao

In Brief

Dena Bank (now Bank of Baroda) sought admission of a petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code against a corporate debtor for initiating insolvency resolution, more than five years after default. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal rejected it as time-barred under the three-year limitation period from the declaration of the account as Non-Performing Asset. The Supreme Court held that limitation does not apply rigidly: if the corporate debtor acknowledged its debt within three years before the petition was filed (through balance sheets, financial statements, or settlement proposals), a fresh three-year period begins. Additionally, a final judgment or Recovery Certificate from the Debt Recovery Tribunal constitutes a fresh cause of action. The Court also clarified that additional documents may be filed and pleadings amended during Section 7 proceedings unless expressly prohibited. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the NCLAT's order.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Limitation Creditor Rights Financial Debt Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login