Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-04-02 disposed

DHARANI SUGARS AND CHEMICALS LTD vs UNION OF INDIA

Bench: 2 — Rohinton Fali Nariman, Vineet Saran

In Brief

The Supreme Court held that while Sections 35AA and 35AB of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 are constitutionally valid, the RBI Circular of February 2018 mandating referral of accounts with exposure exceeding ₹2000 crore to insolvency after 180 days is ultra vires Section 35AA. The Court found that Section 35AA exclusively governs directions to initiate insolvency proceedings and requires government authorization applied to specific defaults of particular debtors, not general categorical rules. The circular's application to all large defaults violated this requirement. Consequently, all insolvency proceedings initiated solely under the circular were declared void from inception, though the constitutional validity of the statutory sections themselves was upheld.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Banking Regulation Constitutional Law Insolvency and Bankruptcy Administrative Law Statutory Interpretation Delegation of Power RBI Authority Stressed Assets Resolution

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login