Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 11 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2018-01-23 remanded

Dheeraj Mor vs Hon'ble High Court of Delhi

Bench: 2 — Chelameswar, Sapre

In Brief

Multiple petitions challenged the High Court of Delhi's refusal to allow advocates and judicial officers to apply for direct recruitment as District Judges due to their existing service status under Article 233(2) of the Constitution. The Supreme Court held that Article 233(2)'s bar on appointment applies only at the point of appointment, not application or selection. Persons may apply and participate in selection if they meet advertised qualifications, even while in service; the Constitutional right to equality (Articles 14 and 16) protects their eligibility to compete. The Court referred the matter to a Constitution Bench to determine definitively whether eligibility should be assessed at application, appointment, or both stages.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Judicial Services Public Services Appointment and Recruitment Article 233 District Judge Appointment Eligibility Criteria

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login