Breaking Supreme Court of India Advocates Balanced Approach to Diwali Firecracker Regulations
New Delhi · Saturday, 07 November 2026
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-07-24 allowed

Dilip Kumar vs Sunita Mittal

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

This case involved a complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act alleging dishonor of cheques issued as security for a loan. During trial, the trial court ordered the respondent to produce Income Tax Returns for seven years (2005-06 to 2011-12). The respondent challenged this order, which was set aside by the High Court. The Supreme Court held that directing production of Income Tax Returns for such a broad seven-year period was not justified. However, since payments were made between December 2011 and May 2012, the Court permitted limited production of returns for only the two relevant assessment years (2012-13 and 2013-14) to the appellant, striking a proportionate balance.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Negotiable Instruments Criminal Law Evidence Civil Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login