Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-08-09 allowed

Director of Horticulture, Odisha vs Pravat Kumar Dash & Ors

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

Trainees employed by Odisha's horticulture department challenged their termination, claiming Article 311 protection. The High Court had held they were entitled to permanent appointment after completing two years of training. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that training completion alone does not confer a right to permanent employment. Public posts must be filled through transparent, competitive selection open to all candidates. The courts lack power to direct appointment outside prescribed recruitment procedures. Article 311 protection does not apply without a valid substantive appointment made through proper procedure.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Constitutional Law Administrative Law Employment Law Public Service Recruitment and Selection

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login