Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Friday, 31 July 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2024-11-06 dismissed

Directorate of Enforcement vs Bibhu Prasad Acharya, etc

Bench: 2 — Abhay S. Oka, Augustine George Masih

In Brief

The Directorate of Enforcement filed money laundering complaints against two public servants—Bibhu Prasad Acharya (Vice Chairman and Managing Director of a state corporation) and Adityanath Das (Principal Secretary)—for alleged offences under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002. The respondents sought quashing on the ground that prior sanction under Section 197(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) was necessary. The High Court agreed and quashed cognizance. The Supreme Court held that Section 197(1) CrPC applies to PMLA proceedings via Section 65 of the PMLA, and is not overridden by Section 71's overriding clause. Cognizance without sanction was therefore improper. The Court dismissed the appeal, clarifying that the respondents' orders stand quashed but the appellant may seek sanction and renew proceedings.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Prevention of Money Laundering Public Servants Prior Sanction Jurisdiction Statutory Interpretation

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login