Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-03-01 dismissed

Dnyandeo Sabaji Naik and Anr vs Pradnya Prakash Khadekar and Ors

Bench: 3 — D.Y. Chandrachud

In Brief

The petitioners sought to challenge a High Court judgment dismissing their eviction appeal, despite having filed an undertaking to vacate the premises by a specified date and obtaining multiple extensions. The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition, holding that the undertaking, combined with the petitioners' conduct in seeking successive extensions and filing a frivolous Review Petition seeking five years' additional time, constituted a blatant abuse of the judicial process. The Court distinguished P.R. Deshpande, holding that an undertaking for mere time to vacate (rather than to secure stay for pursuing further remedies) precludes subsequent challenges on merits. The Court imposed exemplary costs of Rs 5 lakhs to deter frivolous litigation.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Abuse of Process Civil Procedure Conduct of Parties Costs Remedies

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login