In Brief
A widow and her children sued doctors and a nursing home for post-operative medical negligence following her husband's death, nine weeks after a successful kidney transplant. The patient developed complications including infection in his forearm and septicemia, ultimately dying on 3 February 1996. The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of the complaint, holding that medical negligence cannot be inferred from a patient's death alone. The treating doctors were qualified nephrologists who followed accepted medical protocols. The patient's complications and ultimate death resulted from the inherent risks of transplantation, not from any failure to exercise reasonable care and competence.
The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.