Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Monday, 21 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-10-04 allowed

Dushyant N. Dalal and Another vs Securities and Exchange Board of India

Bench: 2 — R.F. Nariman

In Brief

The Supreme Court held that interest on unpaid disgorgement and penalty orders under the SEBI Act can be charged prospectively from 25.8.2014 onwards under Section 28A read with Section 220 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and in equity under the Interest Act, 1978. However, when an original disgorgement order does not expressly provide for future interest till payment—as opposed to quantified interest up to a specific date—no such future interest can be recovered. The Court distinguished between substantive law (interest) and procedural law (recovery mechanisms). In the disgorgement case, since the order did not contain language for future interest (unlike similar orders by the same officer), no interest beyond that quantified to 21.7.2009 was payable. For penalty cases, interest is awardable in equity from the cause of action, but only prospectively from 25.8.2014.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Securities Regulation Administrative Law Interest and Damages Recovery Proceedings Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Disgorgement Orders Penalty Orders Statutory Interpretation Equitable Remedies

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login