Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Tuesday, 22 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2017-08-17 allowed

Enforcement Officer vs Mohammed Akram

Bench: 2 — L. Nageswara Rao

In Brief

The Supreme Court considered whether failing to respond to a summons issued by the Enforcement Directorate under Section 40 of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (FERA) constitutes an offence under Section 56 of FERA. The respondent failed to appear before the Enforcement Officer despite summons, and was acquitted by the Special Court, a decision upheld by the High Court following Kerala High Court precedent. The Supreme Court reversed, holding that disobedience to summons under Section 40 amounts to contravention of the Act and falls within Section 56 of FERA, regardless of any money value involved.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Foreign Exchange Law Criminal Procedure Economic Offences Summons Procedure Administrative Law

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login