Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Friday, 07 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-02-06 allowed

Er. K. Arumugam vs V. Balakrishnan & Ors

Bench: 2 — R. Banumathi

In Brief

The Tamil Nadu Water Supply and Drainage Board entered land with the owner's consent in 1991 to build water supply infrastructure. In a 2016 writ petition, the High Court directed fair and reasonable compensation be paid. The District Collector fixed Rs. 200/- per sq. ft., paying Rs. 1,11,80,723/- total. The landowner then filed a contempt petition, and the Single Judge fixed compensation at Rs. 600/- per sq. ft. The Supreme Court held the Single Judge erred by entertaining the contempt petition (the original direction had been complied with) and by traveling beyond the original order to impose new compensation rates. Public money cannot be extracted through contempt proceedings. The appeal was allowed and the High Court orders set aside."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Contempt of Court Land Compensation Administrative Law Public Money High Court Orders

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login