Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Thursday, 06 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-07-24 dismissed

EX HAV ASHOK KUMAR (S.NO. 6926549M) vs UNION OF INDIA

Bench: 2 — D.Y. Chandrachud, Indira Banerjee

In Brief

An ex-Havildar (non-commissioned officer) in the Indian Army who suffered a stroke and was discharged during his extended tenure due to permanent low medical category sought ex-gratia compensation. Although the Armed Forces Tribunal granted him disability pension and rounded it off from 80% to 100%, the Supreme Court dismissed his claim for ex-gratia compensation. The Court held that while statutory regulations deemed him invalidated for pension purposes, this deeming fiction does not extend to the ex-gratia compensation policy. Ex-gratia compensation requires that personnel be 'boarded out of service on account of disability attributable to or aggravated by military service'—a condition he failed to meet since he was discharged under the conditions of extended tenure for permanent low medical category."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Armed Forces Law Pension and Disability Benefits Statutory Interpretation Government Policy Civil Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login