Breaking Supreme Court Legal Update
New Delhi · Wednesday, 05 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2020-01-31 disposed

For the Karnataka : Mr vs N. Raghupathy, AOR, Md. Apzal Ansari, Advocate

Bench: 2 — <UNKNOWN>, <UNKNOWN>

In Brief

The applicants sought transfer of their criminal case on the ground that the trial judge's preliminary observations suggested bias. The Supreme Court examined whether observations made by the judge to explain procedural delays amounted to prejudgment on the merits. The Court held that such observations were procedural clarifications only and did not disqualify the judge. The Court directed the judge to proceed impartially on evidence, rejecting the transfer application and disposing of the applications.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Procedure Judicial Bias Transfer of Cases Code of Criminal Procedure

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login