Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-01-22 disposed

FORECH INDIA LTD vs EDELWEISS ASSETS RECONSTRUCTION CO. LTD

Bench: 2 — Rohinton F. Nariman, Navin Sinha

In Brief

The Supreme Court addressed the tension between winding-up petitions filed in High Courts before the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code came into force and insolvency petitions filed thereafter under the Code. The Court held that Rules 26–27 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 refer to pre-admission notice and hearing, not post-admission proceedings. Financial creditors may file independent insolvency petitions under Section 7 of the IBC at any time before a winding-up order is passed; such petitions are unaffected by pending High Court proceedings. Section 11(d) of the IBC does not bar creditors from initiating petitions; it only restricts corporate debtors after liquidation is ordered. The Court granted liberty to transfer the pending winding-up petition to the NCLT under the amended Section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Winding-up Corporate Restructuring NCLT Jurisdiction Procedural Law Transfer of Proceedings Financial Creditors Operational Creditors

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login