Breaking SUPREME COURT REAFFIRMS PUBLIC DOMAIN PROTECTION FOR DIGITAL LAWS
New Delhi · Sunday, 20 September 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law - free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2016-02-26 dismissed

Gajanan Dashrath Kharate vs State of Maharashtra

Bench: 2 — R. Banumathi

In Brief

Gajanan Kharate was convicted under Section 302 IPC for murdering his father Dashrath. The father was found dead with multiple injuries inside the house where both lived. While eyewitnesses heard a quarrel and assault the previous night, the key evidence included blood-stained clothes of the accused containing the victim's blood group. The Supreme Court upheld the conviction, holding that when a murder occurs inside a house where the accused is present, the accused must provide a cogent explanation under Section 106 of the Evidence Act. The appellant's failure to explain how his father sustained injuries, combined with circumstantial evidence, established guilt beyond reasonable doubt."

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Criminal Law Evidence Murder Circumstantial Evidence Burden of Proof Explanation under Section 313 CrPC

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login