Breaking SUPREME COURT CRACKS DOWN ON HOME LOAN SUBVENTION FRAUD: CBI PROBE EXPEDITED, 30-DAY SANCTION DEADLINE FOR BANK OFFICIALS
New Delhi · Saturday, 08 August 2026 9888666310 | [email protected]
Free Law — free judgments and free headnotes Free Lawby De Jure
Supreme Court of India 2019-01-24 allowed

GANGARAM vs THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS

Bench: 2 — D.Y. Chandrachud, Hemant Gupta

In Brief

A man appointed as a Projectionist at a medical college hospital in 1991 was challenged by a competing candidate for allegedly lacking the required cinema operator license at the time of application. The High Court had quashed the appointment, but the Supreme Court allowed the appeal. The Court held that under the applicable Rules, an operator may obtain the certificate within three months of appointment; since the appellant acquired it within this period, his appointment was valid and not vitiated by the delayed certification. The appellant had served continuously for 28 years.

The lawyer headnote and full judgment text are available to registered users.

Administrative Law Employment Law Judicial Review Writ Jurisdiction

Read the full judgment & headnote. It's free.

Register to read the complete Supreme Court judgment text and the headnote, and to search 1 lakh+ Supreme Court judgments by meaning. It is a free service.

Register Free Login